Eligible contact types
Decide whether the promise applies only to email addresses or also to phone, fax, cell, office and license fields.
This page documents the accuracy and remedy statements currently present across CARealEstateList and the decisions required to turn them into one enforceable customer policy. It is not yet a finalized guarantee.
These statements cannot all describe the same policy. They are shown for transparency while the business chooses one measurable commitment and one remedy calculation.
| Source | Published statement | Remedy wording | Review status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current product and marketing direction | More than 97% deliverability | Replacement data or a monetary remedy for invalid contacts | Unverified |
| Current Terms & Conditions | 95% deliverability threshold | Replace affected email addresses when approved | Conflicts |
| Legacy general FAQ | Over 96% deliverability | No calculation or remedy defined in that answer | Incomplete |
| Legacy seeded FAQ | 96% deliverability and a 4% bounce threshold | Replacement data above the stated bounce threshold | Conflicts |
The current Terms also describe downloaded products as final and non-refundable. That can coexist with a limited invalid-contact remedy only if the exception, calculation and exclusions are written unambiguously and reviewed before publication.
A percentage alone does not tell a customer which records qualify, how a claim is calculated or what relief will be provided.
Decide whether the promise applies only to email addresses or also to phone, fax, cell, office and license fields.
Define hard bounce, unknown mailbox, accept-all result, temporary failure, block, complaint, disconnected number and other outcomes separately.
Specify which purchased values enter the calculation and which duplicates, blanks, suppressed records or untested values are excluded.
Set the time after delivery during which evidence can be submitted and explain how data decay after delivery is treated.
List the files, provider logs, result codes, dates and original row identifiers required for a reproducible review.
Decide who chooses replacement versus money, whether relief is proportional, and whether a minimum invalidity threshold applies.
The following is a candidate structure for policy review, not the current customer contract. The business must first approve what counts as an eligible submitted value and a confirmed invalid result.
See the deliverability evidence gateUnknown, temporary, blocked, duplicate, blank and out-of-window results need explicit treatment before this calculation can be used.
This is the minimum workflow the final policy and support operation should share. It is a proposed control sequence until the rules and service times are approved.
Match the request to the order, delivered file version and original record identifiers.
Apply the approved invalid, temporary, excluded and duplicate definitions consistently.
Use the approved numerator, denominator, threshold and claim window and preserve the calculation record.
Provide the approved replacement or monetary result, response time and explanation, then retain an audit record.
These decisions require the site owner, the team that validates and fulfills data, customer support and qualified legal review. They cannot be inferred from marketing copy.
Review the masked sample and current Terms & Conditions. Because the existing percentages and remedy descriptions conflict, contact support before purchasing if a particular threshold, refund or replacement process is material to your decision.