Accuracy policy

California Database Accuracy & Invalid-Contact Remedy

This page documents the accuracy and remedy statements currently present across CARealEstateList and the decisions required to turn them into one enforceable customer policy. It is not yet a finalized guarantee.

  • Conflicting thresholds disclosed
  • No unsupported calculation presented as final
  • Policy decisions labelled as pending
Source audit

What the current website sources say

These statements cannot all describe the same policy. They are shown for transparency while the business chooses one measurable commitment and one remedy calculation.

Current accuracy and invalid-contact statements requiring alignment
SourcePublished statementRemedy wordingReview status
Current product and marketing directionMore than 97% deliverabilityReplacement data or a monetary remedy for invalid contactsUnverified
Current Terms & Conditions95% deliverability thresholdReplace affected email addresses when approvedConflicts
Legacy general FAQOver 96% deliverabilityNo calculation or remedy defined in that answerIncomplete
Legacy seeded FAQ96% deliverability and a 4% bounce thresholdReplacement data above the stated bounce thresholdConflicts

The current Terms also describe downloaded products as final and non-refundable. That can coexist with a limited invalid-contact remedy only if the exception, calculation and exclusions are written unambiguously and reviewed before publication.

Required policy inputs

What an enforceable guarantee must define

A percentage alone does not tell a customer which records qualify, how a claim is calculated or what relief will be provided.

Pending approval

Eligible contact types

Decide whether the promise applies only to email addresses or also to phone, fax, cell, office and license fields.

Pending approval

Invalid classifications

Define hard bounce, unknown mailbox, accept-all result, temporary failure, block, complaint, disconnected number and other outcomes separately.

Pending approval

Denominator and exclusions

Specify which purchased values enter the calculation and which duplicates, blanks, suppressed records or untested values are excluded.

Pending approval

Claim window

Set the time after delivery during which evidence can be submitted and explain how data decay after delivery is treated.

Pending approval

Evidence standard

List the files, provider logs, result codes, dates and original row identifiers required for a reproducible review.

Pending approval

Remedy calculation

Decide who chooses replacement versus money, whether relief is proportional, and whether a minimum invalidity threshold applies.

Calculation framework

The denominator must be visible and reproducible

The following is a candidate structure for policy review, not the current customer contract. The business must first approve what counts as an eligible submitted value and a confirmed invalid result.

See the deliverability evidence gate
Candidate invalid-rate calculation
Confirmed eligible invalid valuesAll eligible submitted values

Unknown, temporary, blocked, duplicate, blank and out-of-window results need explicit treatment before this calculation can be used.

Claim review workflow

A traceable process from request to remedy

This is the minimum workflow the final policy and support operation should share. It is a proposed control sequence until the rules and service times are approved.

  1. 1

    Receive a traceable request

    Match the request to the order, delivered file version and original record identifiers.

  2. 2

    Classify submitted outcomes

    Apply the approved invalid, temporary, excluded and duplicate definitions consistently.

  3. 3

    Calculate the eligible rate

    Use the approved numerator, denominator, threshold and claim window and preserve the calculation record.

  4. 4

    Issue and record the remedy

    Provide the approved replacement or monetary result, response time and explanation, then retain an audit record.

Approval checklist

Eight decisions before this page can become a guarantee

These decisions require the site owner, the team that validates and fulfills data, customer support and qualified legal review. They cannot be inferred from marketing copy.

  • PendingChoose one public percentage and define whether it is measured deliverability, a commercial threshold or both.
  • PendingApprove the exact invalid-result classifications and exclusions.
  • PendingApprove the denominator, dataset/test date and period for which the percentage applies.
  • PendingSet the request deadline, evidence format and review response time.
  • PendingSet the minimum invalidity threshold, if any.
  • PendingDecide whether the customer or CARealEstateList chooses replacement data versus money.
  • PendingDefine whether a monetary remedy is proportional, capped or potentially the full order value.
  • PendingAlign Terms, FAQ, homepage, pricing, checkout and customer communications in one release.
Before purchasing

Ask for written clarification if the remedy matters

Review the masked sample and current Terms & Conditions. Because the existing percentages and remedy descriptions conflict, contact support before purchasing if a particular threshold, refund or replacement process is material to your decision.

Contact support